home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT2160>
- <title>
- Sep. 30, 1991: Shadows and Eye Candy
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Sep. 30, 1991 Curing Infertility
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- PHOTOGRAPHY, Page 72
- Shadows and Eye Candy
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Major new books from Annie Leibovitz and Irving Penn frame two
- contrasting angles on the celebrity--and the mysterious Other
- </p>
- <p>By Richard Lacayo
- </p>
- <p> Virginia Woolf believed that human nature changed "in or
- about December, 1910." Actually, it must have been sometime
- between 1943, when Irving Penn became a photographer at Vogue,
- and 1983, when Annie Leibovitz moved her camera from Rolling
- Stone to Vanity Fair. That would explain why the human race that
- appears in Penn's new book, a career summation called Passage
- (Knopf-Callaway; $100), looks so different from the one that we
- see in Photographs Annie Leibovitz 1970-1990 (HarperCollins;
- $60).
- </p>
- <p> Or maybe it's just a small, exotic slice of humanity that
- has changed, the subspecies called celebrities. The decorous
- public figures in Penn's photographs have become Leibovitz's
- feral children. Buck naked, streaked with paint or hanging from
- trees, they sport through the pages of her book and across the
- walls of the International Center of Photography in New York
- City, where a retrospective of Leibovitz's work is on view
- through Dec. 1, before traveling across the U.S. and Europe.
- </p>
- <p> In Penn's world, reputation counts for more than
- celebrity, and fame is no laughing matter. Posed against bare
- backgrounds and pressed by mortal shadows, his stalwart artists
- and writers are icons of modernism at its most brave, clean and
- reverent. Their solemnity may be a pose in itself, but it has
- its metaphorical power. Penn's fashion shots take on greater
- weight in the company of his portraits; the passage of time
- seems to hang over them both. They in turn magnify the effect
- of a third kind of picture that he started taking in 1967, when
- he began to haul his neutral backdrops around the world and put
- before them tribal warriors in New Guinea or the women of
- Cameroon.
- </p>
- <p> At around the same time Penn was also photographing
- hippies and Hell's Angels, so he would have known that it was
- no longer necessary to travel very far to fall off the edges of
- Western civilization: the tribal types were gathering at home.
- One of their favorite spots was the backstage world of rock,
- where Leibovitz started shooting for Rolling Stone in 1970. It
- was a place where parents imagined that the wickedness of
- paganism converged with the self-indulgence of childhood, as if
- the Satyricon were being played out in the aisles of Toys "R"
- Us. Judging from a few of Leibovitz's early pictures--like one
- of rock drummer Keith Moon trysting with his groupies--those
- parents had a point. Rock had become the gateway through which
- the mysterious Other--dark, hedonistic, erotically charged--would find its way out into mass culture.
- </p>
- <p> What few suspected was how quickly all of that could be
- put to the service of marketing, in rock videos and ad
- campaigns. Leibovitz has been a crucial figure in this
- transition. In her most talked-about portraits of the past
- decade, she brought a pagan abandon to the authorized depiction
- of celebrities, a bit of primeval fire for the image machine.
- All those masks and naked flesh, all that mud and body paint:
- what Penn found in West Africa, Leibovitz brings out in Keith
- Haring, Lauren Hutton and Roseanne Barr. In the 1970s she
- discovered that Mick Jagger looked like a wicked faun. A decade
- later, she applied that look to Jeff Koons, '80s art buffoon and
- husband of the Euro-porn star and Italian legislatrix
- Cicciolina. Naked, painted gold, Koons is a naughty sprite who
- darts a little pink tongue. By the time Leibovitz made her
- famous cover shot of Demi Moore, pregnant and unclothed, it was
- hard not to see the actress as the photographer's own version
- of a fertility goddess.
- </p>
- <p> The paradox of Leibovitz's best-known work is that it
- tries to twit propriety in the slickest possible style. Which
- may be why so many of her subjects, no matter how manically
- they act up for the camera, are prone to look shrink-wrapped in
- their own renown. In these rich, sanitary frames, the antics can
- fall flat, the Bette Midlers and Steve Martins can emanate
- nothing so much as the fact of their famousness. In pictures
- that are bright, clear and eye-catching, they become the
- corporate logos of their own celebrity. This must be what a
- primal impulse looks like after it has been fully digested by
- the world of public relations, ad agencies and department
- stores. We have met the Others. They "R" Us.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-